• <output id="aynwq"><form id="aynwq"><code id="aynwq"></code></form></output>

    <mark id="aynwq"><option id="aynwq"></option></mark>
  • <mark id="aynwq"><option id="aynwq"></option></mark><label id="aynwq"><dl id="aynwq"></dl></label>
  • 學習啦>演講與口才>辯論技巧>辯論賽>

    英語辯論題目:你認為應該給大學課堂分配項目嗎

    時間: 雅雯798 分享

      英語辯論跟中文辯論賽是差不多的,今天學習啦小編給大家分享一些英語辯論中的題目,希望對大家有所幫助。

      英語辯論題目:你認為應該給大學課堂分配項目嗎

      CLASS assignment at a Guangzhou university hasprovoked controversy after local press reportedthat a professor asked students to design ahypothetical plan to rob a bank. The professor saidthe same assignment had been used at the HarvardBusiness School to train students how to managehuman resources.

      Many shocked commentators have criticized theassignment as absurd. They suggest that it mayeven encourage students to commit crime. Such aproject wouldn't have any educational value, theyargue. Others say that robbing a bank is not necessarily an innovative idea for a college classproject; it only shows that the educator has run out of legitimate ideas and methods.

      However, a greater number of other commentators support the project. They suggest thatsuch unconventional methods will capture students' imaginations and make the class moreinteresting.

      Students, too, came to the professor's defense, saying it was a very inventive project fromwhich they learned a lot.

      Do you think this is a project that should be assigned to a college class?

      Yes

      It won't turn students into bank robbers. There's no need to make such a fuss over it.

      1. College students are adults with a well-grounded sense of right and wrong. Simply beingasked by a professor to write a plan for robbing a bank isn't going to provoke them to docarry it out.

      2. Not every lesson in a college class has to be about morals or social values. Academicfreedom means professors can give students assignments like this, as long as they arechallenging and educational.

      3. The main problem with the Chinese educational system is its lack of innovation and freshideas. Students have been taught for decades to simply recite and repeat. This project is anexample of educational innovation and should be encouraged, not criticized.

      No

      There are better ways to be innovative in the classroom than designing a bank robbery.

      1. A bank robbery, however hypothetical, usually involves violence. Although college studentsprobably wouldn't carry out such an act, encouraging them to plan violence is inappropriate.

      2. There are better ways to stimulate students' imagination and critical thinking. The fact thatthe professor chose this particular case means that he is not sensitive enough to thestudents' real needs.

      3. Just because the assignment was used at a US college doesn't mean it's suitable for aChinese university class. Borrowing "revolutionary" educational methods from abroad withoutadapting them to the situation in China can lead to problems.

    英語辯論題目:你認為應該給大學課堂分配項目嗎

    英語辯論跟中文辯論賽是差不多的,今天學習啦小編給大家分享一些英語辯論中的題目,希望對大家有所幫助。 英語辯論題目:你認為應該給大學課堂分配項目嗎 CLASS assignment at a Guangzhou university hasprovoked controversy after lo
    推薦度:
    點擊下載文檔文檔為doc格式
    847997 主站蜘蛛池模板: 99久久综合狠狠综合久久aⅴ | 黑白禁区在线观看免费版| 欧美xxxx狂喷水喷水| 国产成人精品高清免费| 久久久久久亚洲精品不卡| 91亚洲va在线天线va天堂va国产| 欧美日韩一区二区三区久久| 国产精品久久久久久久久久免费 | 亚洲的天堂av无码| 调教视频在线观看| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线播放 | 国产精品视频免费| 久草视频免费在线| 老司机67194精品线观看| 太大了阿受不了好爽小说| 亚洲国产精品久久久久久| 青青青伊人色综合久久| 成人免费一区二区三区| 亚洲福利电影在线观看| 黄瓜视频有直播的不| 少妇性俱乐部纵欲狂欢少妇| 亚洲成av人片在线观看www| 香蕉视频在线观看网站| 宝贝过来趴好张开腿让我看看| 亚洲成人黄色网| 免费观看一级毛片| 国产伦理一区二区三区| 国产人妖视频一区在线观看| 成人国产网站v片免费观看| 电影在线观看视频| .天堂网www在线资源| 久热这里只有精| 免费无码又爽又刺激高潮的视频 | 人妖在线精品一区二区三区| 国产精品视频h| 日日噜狠狠噜天天噜av| 波多野结衣在线中文| 麻豆国产一区二区在线观看| japanese性暴力| 久久综合狠狠色综合伊人| 免费被靠视频动漫|